But I'd never actually seen the movies that popularized the concept. To end my Halloween List this year, I visited the four big Mummy movies: the 1932 original, Christopher Lee's 1959 remake, the Branden Fraser 1999 action film, and Tom Cruise's most recent mistake.
Friends, there were surprises.
The Mummy (1932)
Everybody knows The
Mummy, right? A big dude covered in bandages who walks like he needs a hip
replacement, yet somehow chases down adventurers beneath pyramids and crushes
them? An indestructible, thoughtless force of revenge?
Yeah, none of that is in this movie.
It turns out the original Mummy movie was a white peril
narrative. Imhotep is technically a mummy, although even in the sarcophagus he
barely has an bandages and clearly hasn’t had his eyes or brain stirred and
yanked out. Instead he is basically a wizard who gazes into an enchanted pool
and uses a hypnotic ring to prowl the globe for the reincarnation of his lost
love.
Who plays this great Egyptian wizard?
Boris Karloff. You know, the most famous actor to ever play Frankenstein’s
Monster, except this time he’s got make-up to look darker skinned than the rest
of the cast. Black-and-white can’t cover up that Universal just didn’t want to
cast a person of color when they had a creepy white guy who was already under
contract.
His Imhotep finds the reincarnation of his lost love, and
seeks to transform her into what he wants. Karloff’s Imhotep is particularly
sadistic, taking pleasure in manipulating the explorers and gradually
brainwashing a white woman into dressing like he wants and leaving her boyfriend.
Everything about this Imhotep plays to gross stereotypes of foreigners and
people of color that were used by Jim Crow in the 30’s to murder them.
So honestly even if Tom Cruise’s new Mummy actively disrespected the original? Good for it.
The most interesting part of the movie is its unexamined
colonialism. It’s set back when the British were eagerly exploiting Egypt of
resources, including precious treasures that could circulate through their
museums. It’s their disregard for Egyptian history that wakes up Imhotep, and
he disguises himself as a modern Egyptian to encourage them to keep digging. He
specifically mentions that Egyptians cannot dig up their own holy sites,
without clarifying whether European imperialists have legally barred them from
it, or if it’s out of a superstitious fear. Not clarifying helps the movie hold
up a little better today, because both the dread of supernatural violence and
the rampant cultural theft hang over the movie. These are rich outsiders who
seek glory in the name of “science.” It’s a science that doesn’t include anyone
native to the country or cultures they’re mining.
If you want a real classic, try The Haunting or Kwaidan instead.
The Mummy (1959)
If you thought passing Boris Karloff off as an Egyptian
wizard was weird in black-and-white, wait until you see Christopher Lee spray-painted
brown in Technicolor. While Lee spends most of the movie in wrappings, the
flashbacks to him as an Egyptian priest are even more uncomfortable than the
1930’s film. It’s something people have definitely paved over as they remember
Lee.
In typical Hammer Films stunt casting, Lee and Peter Cushing
played the monster and hero in another take on the same story. It’s still about
a mummified monster who is fascinated by the reincarnated vision of his lost
love, although this time the mummy’s name is Kharis. Allegedly this is a remake
of a later Mummy sequel, which is
funny in itself because it has almost every original plot element. It speaks to
how formulaic Universal Pictures got in their monster craze.
This one features Lee as the the iconic mummy, covered in
bandages and shambling after people. To director Karl Freund’s credit, the
attacks are always on people trapped in small rooms, sometimes deliberately
staged by a mastermind for when they’ll be cornered and vulnerable. This time the
mummy is enslaved to Mehemet Bey, a vengeful worshipper of an ancient god, who keeps
dispatching the mummy to kill off the people who defiled the tomb.
In 1959 Bey (played by George Pastell, a Cyprian actor) was definitely
supposed to be a detestable villain. But the movie has aged hard. Now it’s
actually cutting when Bey talks down to Peter Cushing about the British ignoring
the sanctity of tombs and the culture of Egypt. Is having these people murdered
going too far? Sure, but it’s a Horror movie. You signed up for that, and the
exploitation of British colonialism is far bloodier than Bey’s ambitions. Since
none of the explorers is exceedingly likable, it’s easy to root against them.
What the movie amounts to is everything from the original
and more. Between the mummy and Bey, you have two kinds of antagonists pursuing
confused and superstitious researchers. There’s revenge and lost romance, with
the addition of a monster smashing up posh houses. The mummy even becomes
sympathetic because of how conflicted he is with harming Isobel – Peter Cushing’s
girlfriend, and the possible reincarnation of the mummy’s lost love. If you’re
going to watch mummy movies, you’re always on the look-out for who boinked who
in a past life.
The Mummy (1999)
Well this is a damned delight. If you enjoyed this in the
90’s, then it probably holds up for cheesy, character-driven fun today. It
deviates wildly from the classics, creating an action movie out of familiar
items. Imhotep is still obsessed with resurrecting his wrongfully murdered
girlfriend, white interlopers can’t help themselves from waking up curses in
Egypt, and there’s even a pet white cat like in the 1922 original.
Everyone got mad that the 2017 reboot was an action movie,
conveniently forgetting that the 1999 Mummy
is an absolute action movie. Most deaths are off-screen to keep us in
PG-13 land, and even though it’s a fight
against a wizard who will probably slaughter all of Egypt if he wins, the movie
is freaking cute.
Rachel Weisz as Hapless Librarian and Brendan Fraser as
Indiana Jones Lite are perfect together and deserve a long life of smooching as
soon as they shower off the corpse dust. Weisz is stranded in the role of the
woman who’ll be sacrificed to resurrect Imhotep’s girlfriend, but unlike the classic
films, she actually gets to drive some of the plot and unlock mysteries before
the peril. The old Hammer Film definitely wouldn’t have let her get drunk and
practice throwing punches with Fraser.
The two of them are supported by an adorably greedy,
adorably cowardly, and adorably bull-headed cast. If they’re going to steal a
bag of treasure, then they’re going to try to steal two. If they’re going to
help you get to the lost city, then they’re going to fly their by-plane right
through a cursed sand storm until they die delivering you safely. Every
character is shamelessly loud. It doesn’t gel with the classic movies at all
and it doesn’t have to. It is a blast.
You just can’t take the perils as seriously as you would in
the original films. Now when a hypnotized crowd chants “Imhotep,” one of our
heroes might do the same and try to blend in so he isn’t torn apart. More
normal mummy monsters show up and get whacked to pieces in something only a
little more serious than a Three Stooges sketch. Thanks to keen direction from
Stephen Sommers, it never strays too far from cheese. Even when it’s clever, it’s
not too proud of it, and never snide that it’s doing way better than comparable
titles. At its best, watching this Mummy
is like hanging out with a good friend.
My favorite twist was the internalized Eurocentrism taking another
turn: now Americans are part of the invasion equation, and everyone views them
as “the worst.” We’re cowboys, loud oafs who jump too quickly to violence. The
British have become part of the intellectual establishment, still unaware of
their own colonialism, but it’s funny to see them look down on Americans.
The Mummy (2017)
I loved Frankenstein Vs. The Wolfman. I loved Freddy Vs.
Jason. I loved Godzilla, Mothra, and Rodan teaming up to fight King Ghidorah. If
you want to make a cinematic universe based around monsters, then of course I’ll
check it out. And this failed attempt at creating one had a good core premise.
It was supposed to be universe of action movies with quirky
characters running from and fighting classic Horror baddies. The action could
get more intense whenever you liked by leaning on the Horror-end of things – the
vulnerability of death being more meaningful than in standard action movies.
That could have been great.
More than any other factor, what killed this movie was its tone.
This time out the mummy is a lady out to sort of resurrect her dead boyfriend
and sort of find a host for a demon she made a pact with thousands of years
ago, and the host she’s picked for both projects is Tom Cruise. Given the shape
he’s in at 57, I don’t blame her. And in their first significant scene, this
mummy lady corners the terrified man, then creepily mounts him, and then sensually
fondles him like she thinks it’s a romance while he thinks it’s awkward, and
during this foreplay she winds up accidentally tickling him and he giggles.
Tom Cruise giggled because a mummy was sexually assaulting him.
And three seconds later, they tried to make the scene scary.
Shockingly, this movie bombed.
The 2017 Mummy has
no idea when to be scary, when to fight for its life, and when to do comic
relief. It frequently pivots between three or four emotions in ten seconds.
That doesn’t even work in slapstick comedy, let alone a blockbuster action
piece.
You can tell the movie is proud of its big subversion of
making the mummy a lady this time. Pointing out another problem with the entire
series, since the mummy targets a man to brainwash into being her lover this
time, this becomes the first time that victim is the POV in the series. The “Dark
Universe” hinged on Tom Cruise bravely standing up to and killing off a woman
half his size, and you will not believe how they wrap up that conflict. I won’t
spoil it. I can’t do this mistake of cinema justice.
It actually tries to be more politically disgusting than the classics. Cruise and his buddy are in the U.S.
military but only seem to have signed on so they can loot the Middle East for
treasure. They’re not even British museum goons dedicated to recording history.
They just want to cash in on the war in Iraq. They quip at each other, treat putting
civilians and soldiers in harm’s way as a gag, and we’re supposed to love them
for it. Add to this Cruise getting a one night stand who hates his guts until,
literally after ten minutes, she becomes the love of his life willing to die
for him, and you have a cast that is ready to dwindle in the $5 bin at
Wal-Mart.
What it really squanders is Sofia Boutella’s performance.
She chews scenery and is often a creepy and affecting mummy. The back story of
her being a ruthless warrior is less convincing than her demeanor. You can see
the earnest desire for her to fulfill her pact and believe in certain people,
while also never straying too far from being intimidating as Hell itself. She’s
like a more intimidating Hela from Thor:
Ragnarok stranded in a much worse movie. Her role as this monster sorceress
deserved to be plugged into a more competent movie. It would’ve been fun to see
her rip Dracula’s minions apart.
Fortunately Boutella stayed in Horror, and is starring in a much better-reviewed movie with A24 Films next year. Climax looks pretty wild.
This wraps up The Halloween List for 2018! I averaged more than a movie a day for the entire month and had time for two miniseries. What did you wind up watching? What looked most interesting?
If you swaddled me in bandages I would probably shamble after you too.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your thoughtful (and fascinating) takes on movies I will not see.