I’ve been thinking about terrorism a lot this summer. It’s
easy to, between awful events abroad, and multiple shootings here in the U.S. Terrorists
are a peculiar set of murderers; they are one of the few segments of the human
population who it is laudable to kill. They are black sheep who bring it upon
themselves, folk who perform such evil work that no one will tell you to stop
hating them.
There’s a corrosive irony to hating people for their hatred,
and I fear in many cases it leads to harmful reciprocity. My family mostly
hails from Ireland and what
was once Czechoslovakia,
two sources of nightmarish reciprocal hatred. Hutus and Tutsis, Jews and Arabs,
Protestants and Catholics – history can be a catalog of revenge, but there are
more personal examples. Consider
Harvey Pekar being beaten daily in his
childhood by black children who had experienced such oppression that they
attacked a light-skinned child out of instinctive reciprocity.
In that context, even feeling terribly for his victims in Aurora, the national rush
to hate Jason Holmes unnerved me. Especially if the man were insane, hating him
would neither repair what he did nor better equip us to deal with others like
him who are out there now. These are feelings I haven’t worked out, but they’re
the same that gave me no pleasure at the killing of Osama Bin Laden. The “5/1”
episode of The Newsroom reminded me
how out of sorts I felt that night, when the U.S. celebrated that they’d shot a
man.
Helping the harmed is more worth celebrating than punishing
the harmer. That is how you spread a valuable behavior; we can be compassionate
every day, rather than vengeful once, and if we were violently vengeful every
day the world would be awash in gore. I
appreciate catharsis. I understand our long (and likely genetic) history of
vengeance, and that our senses of justice vary - but under no circumstances
where there are victims ought compassion to be disengaged. After the Texas
A&M shooting, I wondered why it was that millions of people can watch a
news program hating a killer, rather than paying attention to those directly
affected who require assistance. It would be ugly to reduce this to
entertainment value.
This is why I support
Indiegogo’s donation drive to assist victims and surviving families of the shooting at Milwaukee’s
Sikh Temple. To the cynics: this is a cleat
example of good in the world. This isn’t even a Kickstarter that will get you a
neat gadget or album in the end; it’s just a drive by some connected people to
connect many others in gestalt aid.
This is not about judging or hating a shooter. This is about
compassion for victims. All proceeds will go to paying medical bills and
funeral costs for people who were caught in this terrible event. Already over
1,500 people have pledged to help with medical bills of survivors and funeral
costs of the deceased.
It’s heartening that they’ve passed their original $25,000
goal to (at this writing) $155,310. But anyone who has suffered the pain of
burying a loved one knows funerary costs can be immense. The United States’ healthcare system
has a proper reputation, too, for disastrously high costs for dramatic
injuries, even with health insurance. In this case, no wounded victim could
have suspected such problems before bullets tore into their place of worship.
If you can spare a donation, please consider it. If you can’t,
and plenty of people can’t in this economy, please simply consider every other
way we participate in these matters. It will determine what world we live in.