Today's is going to be a long post. Instead of just writing independent reviews of the two hot-topic films, I want to talk about them in relation to each other. If you haven’t gotten to them yet, I won’t spoil the third act of either. But Under the Skin and It Follows are very interesting Horror movies to have come out so close to each other – they’re both films about victimization, but from opposite sides of it. They’re both about predators hijacking sexuality for their own unknowable ends.
But most people I know like one and loathe the other. When
they condemn whichever of the two they dislike, they label it sex-negative. I
disagree with that reading for either film. Rather, both feel rooted in Horror’s
history of finding something desirable and finding a way to make it terrifying.
Friday the 13th did that
with cabin vacations; Jaws did it for
swimming; and it’s easy to forget, having grown up with John Carpenter’s Halloween, that the holiday wasn’t
always so blood-soaked, but rather that movie helmed a change in cultural
attitudes around the holiday.
Unfortunately Halloween also helped cement tropes about
sexuality in Horror. The tropes are unhealthy, and even baffling when you find
the liberal attitudes of their screen writers and directors. John Carpenter and
Wes Craven were startled when people confronted them about things latent in
their work. It's why Craven went out of his way to subvert some of those tropes in Scream.
So when Horror turns sex into an actual theme, it has to be
mindful. Slasher Movies didn’t originally intend to punish teen sexuality, but
it became a tradition, and one that It
Follows deliberately fights back against. Under the Skin goes for something weirder.
Let’s look.

