I’m bad with goals. On January 8
th I started
writing my next novel with the goal of a minimum of a thousand words per day,
but with my attention on writing scenes, chapters and arcs – of getting the
text right. I write much more when I focus like that, which became the problem,
because on the first day I wrote about 2,900 words. On the second day, I wrote about
2,900 more. On the third, I wrote 2,300, and felt exhilarated, having never
started a novel so quickly, but also like I’d cheated and profoundly failed.
Do you recognize the problem? Do you have it, too?
Last week I managed to drag my chubby butt to 2.54 miles on
the elliptical machine. It was the farthest I’d ever gone, and was so hard on
my body that I was trembling for the next hour and felt exhausted the next
morning. When I climbed on the next day and didn’t match that all-time record,
my heart sunk. I was sweaty, and spent, and my neuromuscular syndrome flared up
so badly I couldn’t bend my knees, and I felt like I hadn’t done enough.
I've habituated expanding my goals to a cancerous degree. We often talk about failure in terms of not reaching goals. Figuring
out what you can achieve and what’s reasonable to push is vital. You have to
learn to make a routine, and then to push. I fail in these ways all the time –
it is, allegedly, mortal. But there are other ways to fail. Victory can defeat you.
|
It's a good line. ... Shut up. |
Goals can’t remain static. It’s ridiculous to teach a baby
to take her first steps and then never expect her to perform more than that. In
writing, you want to push you productivity up if you can. If you can write 500
words in a weekend for months, then it’s healthy to try for 1,000. If you can
bench fifty, try sixty. Sure.
But figuring out the limits above those goals is essential,
and it’s something I’m terrible at. You can psychoanalyze me as the boy who
learned to walk again, who didn’t readjust into school well enough and was
brutalized for it, who wound up with nerds who all pulled better grades, and thusly
craved to exceed his performance. I don’t think the mind is that simple, or
that one reason is ever trustworthy for a whole personality. But I knew within
seconds of seeing “2.56 miles” on the elliptical’s panel that I was going to
guilt myself over not hitting that again tomorrow. And I knew I shouldn’t, and
that it wasn’t healthy, and that I couldn’t stop it.
This is part of why I hate critics who backbite at authors
for having a slow pace. It took Harper Lee a lifetime to make To Kill a Mockingbird, and then she was
done. Truman Capote, of significantly faster work and greater output, supported
and championed Lee. They weren’t competitors, and one wasn’t failing for not
having the process of the other.
Goading people into rushing risks breaking them. Screw
breaking their work – and yes, dashing towards word count like #NaNoWriMo ruins
plenty of decent novels – it can damage their development.
No one browbeat me into writing 33,700 words in my first two
weeks on this novel. That I am now significantly ahead of schedule and feel the
dread of being behind is a doom of my own making. It’s hardly fast composition – I have friends
who are self-publishing books like they shed manuscripts. But today, after
writing two emotionally demanding chapters in separate time lines, and having difficulty
even sitting up in the chair afterward, I didn’t feel accomplished. I felt
sicker and I felt like I’d failed.
Don’t do this. And if you’re like me, let’s talk it out.
|
Consequences. |
There are authors I respect who advise to lock everything
up, to be cold, and be as productive as possible. As someone who won’t fall
asleep tonight because the mere strain of writing has jacked up his health
problems such that he may not fall asleep tonight, please take my advice:
ignore those authors. Mind yourself. Mind your goals and your limits.
And if somehow I become the Capote to your Lee, trust
me that I will be overjoyed to share your one book with the world.