Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Bathroom Monologue: If you could go back in time and kill the child Hitler, preventing his rise to power, would you?

"No. No, and it's nothing to do with abhorring child death. Children are selfish, whining, smelling, self-soiling, infinitely needy little shells of humanity. I guarantee the child Adolf Hitler would not woo me with his cuteness or tiny mustache. I'd leave Hitler alive because I know we can beat him. He takes his advantages and commits his atrocities, but eventually he mismanages his militaries, undervalues the Americas, and shoots himself in despair. It is only briefly tempting to throttle the infant Hitler and prevent a Third Reich, a second World War, and the invention of the word "genocide." But the Europe you leave without Hitler is still a Europe bitterly anti-Semitic, economically ravaged, and endlessly bellicose. Looking at the child playing and finger-painting, you are forced to realize he does not take advantage of history. He was an agent. World War I hasn't even happened yet and you think you'll leave the world a sunnier place. I fear that a more cunning person or politic will fill the Adolf Hitler-shaped void in history. The replacement will come from the same underground discontent, and the same well of hatemongering crackpots who would slaughter and unify.  What you're gambling upon isn't even that they'd seize power. It's that they won't have more progressive military plans, that they won't capitalize on the nuclear bomb before the U.S., and that they won't start the Final Solution earlier. You are gambling that what replaces this child will be something we defeat. As much as I grieve for what he grows up to set in motion, I can't trust the motion to tend itself."

5 comments:

  1. Halfway through this I was vehemently opposed to what your character is saying. I was thinking, no, I would kill a Hitler child because of all the lives that one act would save. Then I continued reading and was drawn in by the argument. I considered it for a few moments but then still realized that getting rid of HItler while the getting was good, was good.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In my mind it boils down to the Devil we know vs. the one we don't. As you point out, when we discuss changing events in the past, we open up an infinite amount of better - or worse - possibilities and outcomes. Instead of killing the child Hitler, perhaps one could make sure that he was accepted into an art program instead (I believe he was rejected) - and then he might have channeled all of his energy into painting.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thought-provoking piece. Well done.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Who knows what killing the enfant Hitler would bring. No, I am with you, leave him alive. Perhaps not for the same reasons, but he survives just the same. Sadly.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You know in an alterntive universe Adolf could have been a greenie - just a thought.

    ReplyDelete

Counter est. March 2, 2008